bet9ja.com
Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting ban?
By Natalie Sherman
Business press reporter, New york city
A restriction on sports betting in the majority of US states might be overturned by a case being thought about by the Supreme Court.
The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that mainly disallowed sports betting gaming, describing the matter as a "states' rights" issue.
The case, which began on Monday, follows New Jersey residents voted in 2011 to legalise sports betting.
A group of sports betting leagues opposes wagering on games, which they fear will encourage match-fixing.
Lower courts have consistently ruled versus New Jersey, saying it is within the federal government's power to restrict a state's policy options.
The Supreme Court decided to hear the case nevertheless amidst a larger shift in American mindsets toward gaming.
Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal gambling establishments outside Native American lands.
But in current years, states starving for tax profits in the wake of the financial crash have enacted a rash of looser gambling laws, gathering substantial levies on gambling earnings.
There are now 24 states with commercial casinos - roughly double the number a decade ago.
Despite the main ban, which currently excuses Nevada and three other states, illegal sports betting wagering is swarming in the US.
Americans position about $154bn in unlawful sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.
The association's president, Geoff Freeman, explained the federal ban, external as an "utter failure" previously this year.
It states the UK is an example of a nation where sports betting is prevalent.
"It's time for Washington to stop denying states of critical tax profits and enable them to enjoy the rewards of a regulated market," Mr Freeman stated.
More than 15 states filed documents in assistance of New Jersey in the event. A handful have already passed laws to authorise sports betting wagering in the event of a modification.
'Times have changed'
On Monday, as lawyers began for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.
The court is anticipated to make a decision in June 2018.
"If we achieve success here we might have bets being taken in New Jersey within 2 weeks of a decision by the court," said outgoing New Jersey governor Chris Christie after going to the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're prepared to go."
Despite the court's final judgment, Congress may likewise use up the argument in the middle of wider discussion about online video gaming and e-sports betting.
Even a few of the expert sports betting leagues have actually started to change their positions on the concern of sports betting.
Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would develop an uniform set of rules throughout the US. "Times have altered," he composed in a 2014 opinion piece, external.
Addicts dealing with mobile sports betting
3 October 2017
bit.ly
The difficult issue of problem sports betting
31 August 2017
bet9ja.com
1
Will it be a Slam Dunk for the US Sports Betting Ban?
malloryvrg7111 edited this page 2025-01-02 11:57:43 +08:00